Vivmark Residential
Vivmark Residential focused on building, buying, and managing high-quality apartment communities across major U.S. metro areas. The company owns or held investments in more than 184,000 rental apartments across premier U.S. markets and over 11,100 apartments under construction. Vivmark Residential …
Vivmark Residential focused on building, buying, and managing high-quality apartment communities across major U.S. metro areas. The company owns or held investments in more than 184,000 rental apartments across premier U.S. markets and over 11,100 apartments under construction. Vivmark Residential based in Chicago, Illinois.Looks overvalued
5-year outlook: Not shown because confidence is low: Earnings-based DCF is somewhat apart.
Why: Free cash flow is positive and in line with earnings, and the dividend is small, so a cash-flow DCF fits best.
Details and the full model are below.
Market price above modeled range
Showing the FCFF (steady state) you selected on the company card, using 22.64% growth, 2.3% terminal growth and 9% discount. The range varies these assumptions slightly; it is illustrative, not investment advice. Low confidence: the modelled value is far from the market price, which usually means the model does not capture this company well (for example expected growth well above its history).
Assumptions: growth 22.64%, discount rate 9%, terminal growth 2.30% (sector defaults). See a worked example.
Blended growth assumption: 22.6% (sector default 5.1%, own revenue history 5.5%, analyst revenue consensus 40.0%).
Analyst consensus expects revenue growth of 49.2% a year; the growth assumption used is 22.6%.
Adjust assumptions
Show the recommended model instead
Why this model: Free cash flow is positive and in line with earnings, and the dividend is small, so a cash-flow DCF fits best.
Compare models- Recommended: Free-cash-flow DCF — USD 84.22 (+29.1%)
-
EPS-based Gordon proxy
— USD 34.82 (-46.6%)
Not used: Treats all earnings as if paid out and ignores the cash kept for reinvestment, so it overstates value for companies that retain most profit.
-
DCF (trailing free cash flow)
— USD 84.22 (+29.1%)
Not used: Not chosen: Free-cash-flow DCF ranks ahead of it for this company.
-
FCFF (steady state)
— USD 24.54 (-62.4%)
Not used: Assumes only the long-run terminal growth rate from today, so it ignores the near-term growth expected.
-
EV/EBITDA (12x)
— USD 48.88 (-25.1%)
Not used: Used only when free cash flow is far below earnings even after averaging three years; a fixed 12x multiple also ignores sector differences.
-
Fade DCF (10-year growth fade)
— USD 83.45 (+27.9%)
Not used: An alternative growth path (fading over 10 years) shown for comparison; the automatic choice does not use it.
-
EV/Sales (Rule of 40)
— USD 100.33 (+53.8%)
Not used: Used only for technology and communication companies whose cash-flow value is far below the price.
| Bear USD 13.44 | -385.4% |
| Base USD 24.54 | -165.8% |
| Bull USD 45.10 | -44.7% |
Margin = (value − price) / value, so it is measured against the value and reads lower than the upside to value, which is measured against the price. Positive means the price is below that case.
Track record: see the methodology page for how this model has performed historically, including its limits. Treat it as a screen, not a forecast.
Price history and fair value
No chartable saved daily price history is available for this range. The chart uses stored EODHD prices only and will appear after history is saved.
More detail: quality, peers, price history, dividends and financials
Quality score: 82 / 100
Five equal checks on reported history: profitability, cash generation, revenue growth, balance sheet and margins. It describes business quality, not whether the price is attractive.
| Profitability | 5 of 5 years profitable | 20 / 20 |
| Cash generation | free cash flow positive in 5 of 5 years | 20 / 20 |
| Growth | revenue +4.9% a year | 12 / 20 |
| Balance sheet | net debt 3.8x EBITDA | 10 / 20 |
| Margins | EBITDA margin 73% | 20 / 20 |
Peers in Real Estate
Same-sector companies with a valuation, most undervalued first. Compare the margin of safety, yield and quality score side by side.
| Company | Price | Margin of safety | P/E | P/B | Yield | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMRK (this company) | USD 65.25 | 22.5% | 28.6 | 2.4 | 4.2% | 82 |
| HST Host Hotels & Resorts | USD 24.63 | 44.2% | 16.4 | 2.6 | 3.9% | 100 |
| ARE Alexandria Real Estate Equities | USD 45.17 | 23.7% | – | 0.5 | 7.8% | 44 |
| UDR UDR, Inc. | USD 37.01 | 8.2% | 17.2 | 3.8 | 7.1% | 82 |
| VICI Vici Properties | USD 25.21 | 6.2% | 11.8 | 1.0 | 7.0% | 80 |
| UTG.L Unite Group PLC | GBP 4.95 | -3.3% | 24.9 | 0.5 | 6.3% | 68 |
| DLN.L Derwent London Plc | GBP 19.57 | -4.9% | 13.6 | 0.6 | 4.1% | 60 |
| WDP.BR Warehouses De Pauw SA | EUR 19.33 | -5.5% | 11.9 | 0.9 | 6.2% | 80 |
| DOC Healthpeak Properties | USD 20.12 | -7.6% | 35.7 | 1.8 | 6.1% | 76 |
| Peer median | 16.4 | 0.9 | ||||
Dividends
Paid in the last 12 months: USD 2.80 per share · yield 4.29% at the current price.
| Year | Dividends per share |
|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | 2.802 |
| 2025 | 2.754 |
| 2024 | 2.025 |
| 2023 | 2.652 |
| 2022 | 2.500 |
| 2021 | 2.412 |
Trailing 12-month financials
TTM through 30 Jun 2026 · quarterly EODHD data · data downloaded 05 Nov 2026 16:07
| Revenue | USD 3,136,339,000 |
|---|---|
| EBITDA | USD 2,274,299,000 |
| EBIT | USD 1,261,219,000 |
| Net income | USD 875,355,000 |
| Free cash flow | USD 1,175,695,000 |
| Capital expenditures | USD 390,396,000 |
| Debt | USD 8,565,500,000 |
| Cash | USD 36,405,000 |
| Working capital | USD -1,070,678,000 |
| Shares outstanding | 383,878,000 |
| Reported dividends per share | USD 2.7440 |